Macro Anemone
Dual_carriageway_900.jpg
Iceberg_on_Jökulsárlón_Glacier_Lagoon_900.jpg
Tower_of_London_Poppies_900.jpg
Stalins_Seven_Sisters.jpg
Waiting_in_queue_to_enter_arena-5387.jpg
Para_Athletics_London_2017_900.jpg
Takoukout_Well.jpg
23208.jpg
Fig_20__Landscaping_and_additional-1160.jpg
HMS Victory-0100.jpg
Namibia dust trail-8499.jpg
previous arrow
next arrow
Shadow

My thoughts

BIM gets bigger

 

BIM gets bigger

 [Published in Civil Engineering Surveyor (CES) on October 2014]

 

We know of BIM as Building Information Modelling and recognise the function of the 3D Model and the importance of Information Management. I recently heard the Building word described as a verb, which could therefore be equally replaced with creating or developing Information Modelling, or perhaps Management.

Irrespective of what BIM is called it is about people, information, process, codification, and technology, in that order. With people being the largest proportion, at about 70%. The people element includes the training in new technology and new process, but more importantly the cultural change to make the working day better, for almost everyone involved. Then add the collaboration element.

BIM at a single project level now incorporates change to the management of the supply change, and significant revision to the relevant procurement strategy. The contract and commercial departments have to adopt different approaches, especially with respect to change. All the information is shared and available to all. There is no hiding place, no muddy waters. The planning department now has information about rate of construction, or outputs directly from the model, so all of the work is accounted for. They can therefore concentrate on the sequence of works, ensuring that the floor supporting the wall is built before the wall, and that can be checked using the visualisations of BIM 4D. The estimators can have the quantity take-off finished in minutes rather than weeks, or months. Link that take-off to a rates database and you have near instant estimating. Of course the estimator’s skill then needs to be applied to the rates to account for particular complexities and parameters. This ability in turn leads to the concept of design to a budget. All without huge amounts of rework. The quantity surveyor can create valuations and forecasts from the model, together with cost to complete. Progress can be monitored in 3D using the model and site cams. The designer can create option reports with meaningful cost and programme considerations, together with informed decisions regarding ‘safety by design’, whole life costs, and carbon footprint. The Engineering Assurance team can become involved progressively and contribute collaboratively during the currency of the design instead of sequentially. Nobody enjoys getting a surprise present on a Friday afternoon of 300 paper drawings dropped on their desk, for checking within 14 days. Better to be involved and sign off to the 3D model you have seen develop. Not forgetting the safety benefits of visualisations at your desk instead of a visit to site.

Before we leave BIM at project level, there are all of those diverse surveys to consider. LiDar, Topographical, Arial, Drones, Gauge Clearance, mounted Laser, hand held laser, Setting Out robots, and what might be called As-Built robots. Robots that check the position and orientation of elements as they are constructed to ensure they are within tolerance, and then updates the model with the as-built data. It is all a long way from a chain, an Inver tape, a dumpy level and a 20” theodolite. We now have a point cloud with RGB and photos attached. Add a touch or augmented reality and are we into science fiction.

We have previously talked about joining all this information together across time and space, along the liner asset. But there is still more to come from this BIM thing.

Add all the asset information, and create the basis of the Asset Management tools to feed you AM strategy and plan. Suddenly you have PAS 1192.3 and BSI 55 compliant process and enough information to create Performance by RAMS, Reliability, Availability, Maintainability, and Safety (and Security}. It is not really that simple, but at least there is the beginning of the information required to develop.

So we have project BIM, and then programme BIM, added together to provide Network Models and Asset Management. Surely it can’t get any bigger.

Yes it can, then start to link in, and merge GIS. The whole world of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) starts to open the horizons. You may use the GIS data to assess population structure and demographic prior to using predictive analysis to assess growth potential. Then link this to passenger growth to assess and demonstrate enhanced capacity requirements. You establish you need a four track railway again, which had been reduced to two track in the period of low usage. The feasibility mode interacts to establish if three tracks will provide the required capacity, or if four necessary.  Four it is then.

Extent that thought into ‘Smart Cities’ and whole country transport policy, and perhaps you have HS2. And HS3, 4, and 5. Another scenario is using the GIS data pertaining to weather to predict future resilience of the Network and to plan ongoing protection measures. It is all about the information, how we collect it, structure it and use it together, in a joined up intelligent manner, to the benefit of People.

Joining the dots, and the ones, on a massive scale. Part on the information revolution. Part of the revolution we are engaged in.

 

BIM: Driving internal change

 

BIM: Driving internal change

 [Published in Civil Engineering Surveyor (CES) on September 2014]

 

At the same time as we engage with the supply chain we should commence the internal change process. Perhaps a more difficult task that that of engaging with the supply chain.

Traditional Change Management wisdom tends to indicate a ten year programme driven from the very top of the organisation, with vigour and commitment. A clear goal and manageable steps to it equate to a transition plan that can be monitored, reported upon, and tweaked along the way as necessary.

Ah, such luxury.

If we start with the premise that BIM will impact all areas of an organisation and that cultural change is required to acquire the appropriate collaborative behaviours across the business we will not be far of the mark. We have the beginning of a concept of scale. Any area that is not impacted, and that will not be many, has been at least considered. The equivalent of a right side failure.

It would appear therefore that we are embarking on a quest to change the whole organisation.

As if you had not guessed, this is where the problems start.

BIM: Engage with the supply chain

 

BIM: Engage with the supply chain

 [Published in Civil Engineering Surveyor (CES) on July/August 2014]

 

Previously I have discussed

  • ‘Is BIM bigger than Latham?, - Information flow, management and modelling; Parts 1, 2, & 3’,
  • ’BIM – Where does rail fit in?’,
  • ‘BIM: The first teetering steps’ and
  • ‘BIM and BIG’

Within ‘BIM: The first teetering steps’ there was mention of forming a ‘club’. This was part of the engagement with the supply chain. This engagement now needs to widen. The ripple has to travel further to more people. Throw in a bigger stone.

It starts with discussing BIM, its implementation and the implications with individual design houses. However, this has limitations in respect of time, rate of spreading the ripple, and the impact of collaborative change.

Instead of one at a time, a better more collaborative approach is to have a supplier forum. The ‘club’ includes Surveyor, Designer, and Contractor as part of the supply chain. This is a reasonable consist for the supplier forum. Initially look to the supply chain to express an interest in attending a forum about BIM in each of the disciplines, perhaps starting with the design houses.

BIM and big

 

BIM and Big

 [Published in Civil Engineering Surveyor (CES) on May 2014]

 

We have talked about the first teetering steps, but where are the steps leading to.

BIM is frequently considered at a single project level, which is totally understandable for a discrete building, a new build for a single client. Perhaps it is the only building for that client. BIM can easily make an impact, used from the very conception of the project, through detailed design and construction and on into maintenance of the building and facilities management.

The next significant intervention will hopefully be an extension (not demolition) where the BIM model can be resurrected and dusted off, ready for reuse. There are some problems with this concept though. One is the CIC BIM Protocol seems to preclude such ongoing use. However, there are more fundamental issues. The BIM model obviously is more than just the 3D graphic image, there is all the information and data attached to it. Is that information still valid? For the initial project we gathered all sorts of new and old data together to inform the design. That data became part of the BIM model. Following construction a Health and Safety file was produced, BIM style.

Is there a process for keeping the initial information up to date, if not it becomes tired very quickly. The time is soon upon us that the data is considered unreliable and should therefore be discounted. This is a sad loss of a significant amount of knowledge. Never mind, let us re-invent the wheel again.

BIM: The first teetering steps

 

BIM: The first teetering steps

 [Published in Civil Engineering Surveyor (CES) on March 2014]

 

So, you have read some articles on BIM, spoken to a few people, perhaps attended a conference. Now it is time to dip the toe in the water, it is time for BIM for Infrastructure.

The assumption is that you are working for an informed Client, with a significant amount of infrastructure work each year, and have the backing of a local senior manager, a decision maker who can make a difference in the local context.

You have been banging on about BIM for the last six months at various levels and forums, such that there is a general awareness, and possibly a few isolated pockets of enthusiasm.

The first thing you need is a BIM strategist, champion, or evangelist. Not somebody to create a new department and an ongoing resource requirement. More a transient resource to help the team get to grip with BIM and to attain the outcomes it wants to achieve, even if the team does not yet know what those outcomes are. The goal must be that BIM is part of the day job, embraced by the team wholeheartedly.

Keep the stabilisers on the bike for the moment.

BIM - Where does rail fit in?

 

BIM - Where does rail fit in?

[Published in Civil Engineering Surveyor (CES) on Feb 2013]

Title changed and published as a letter to the Editor, with agreement.

Information Flow, Management and Modelling

Is BIM bigger than Latham? Follow up

Introduction

I have been asked questions about Information Flow, Management and Modelling (IFMaM) and Building Information Modelling (BIM). Currently they resolve into three or four (depending on how you count) core questions;

  • How will BIM impact upon the railways,
  • Who should own the model,
  • Are there opportunities to set up BIM consultancies,
  • What will happen to Quantity Surveyors?

These are all very valid and interesting questions which I will attempt to answer, from my own perspective.

How will BIM impact upon the railways?

This question is also put as ‘Will BIM have any significance in the railways?’ I will fuse them to make ‘Will BIM have any significance in the railways, and if so what impact will it have?’ Asking around, I have found that there is little appreciation of BIM in the railway environment generally. It seems to be business as usual. However, being a consultant has some advantages. I am able to see lots of different sides of the industry, from Designer, Contractor, and Client, and get a feel for things that I would otherwise have no knowledge of. I am therefore aware of some of the things going on in the background, which, in this instance, I do not consider to be indiscreet to share with you.

Latest Article

Most read article in last 100 days