My exploration of Genealogy

Home Search Login
Print

Search Results


Matches 1 to 50 of 465 for First Name starts with JAMES

1 2 3 4 5 ... 10» Next» | Heat Map

 #  Last Name, Given Name(s)    Person ID   Born/Christened    Location   Tree | Branch 
1
Abrahams, James		I1876085612  b. 1845  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
2
Adams, James		I26659361874  b. Abt 1850 Yeovil, Somerset, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
3
Adamson, James E (Jim)		I12495725496    Hurst Improbable Family Tree
4
Anderson, James		I26115337429  b. About 1884 Belfast, Co Antrim, N Ireland  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
5
Anderson, James		I26115337124  b. 26 Oct 1908 Salford, Lancashire, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
6
Anteney, James		I320079373082  b. Abt 1841 Redbridge, Hampshire, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
7
Antony, James		I320079369287  b. 1807 Millbrook, Hampshire, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
8
Bailey, James		I12488367174  b. 1615 England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
9
Bailey, James		I12488365510  b. 1632 Helpringham, Lincolnshire, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
10
Bailey, James		I12488367203  b. 1665 Helpringham, Lincolnshire, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
11
Bailey - Baily, James		I12488362028  b. 20 Aug 1727 Helpringham, Lincolnshire, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
12
Barfoot, James		I320125989484  b. 12 Jul 1709 Bishops Waltham, Hampshire, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
13
Barrow, James		P241    One Place Study of Sopley
14
Barrow, James		I222    One Place Study of Sopley
15
Barter, James		P319    The people of Whiteparish
16
Batcheler, James		I320080981432  b. Abt 1854 Twineham, Sussex, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
17
Bays, James		I322161453956  b. Abt 1801  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
18
Beavis, James		I1798601105  b. Abt. 1824 Southampton, Hampshire, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
19
Beeden, James		I12461538905  b. 1830 Silk Willoughby, Lincolnshire, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
20
Beeden, James Abbott		I12461538903  b. 1826 Silk Willoughby, Lincolnshire, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
21
Bell, James Richard Charles		I322004383323  b. 30 Nov 1866 St Denys, Portswood, Hampshire, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
22
Bell, James Walter George		I322004383325  b. Oct 1896 South Stoneham, Hampshire, England.  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
23
Bell, James William Charles		I322004383333  b. 1897  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
24
Bennett, James		I320187587948  b. 1759? BAPTISED NURSLING CHURCH, HAMPSHIRE  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
25
Bennett, James		I320187587956  b. 1811 MICHELMERCH, ROMSEY  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
26
Bennett, James		I320187393509  b. 8 July 1813 Michelmersh, Romsey, Hampshire, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
27
Bennett, James		I320189615362  b. Bef 17 Jan 1836 Romsey, Hampshire, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
28
Bennett, James		I320187395086  b. Abt 1850 Eling, Hampshire, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
29
Bennett, James		I320187347841  b. Abt 1874 Hursley, Hampshire, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
30
Biddlecomb, James		P129    Biddlecombe One Name Study
31
Biddlecombe, James		I7    Biddlecombe One Name Study
32
Biddlecombe, James		I8    Biddlecombe One Name Study
33
Biddlecombe, James		I322232494733  b. 1725 Beaulieu, Hampshire, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
34
Biddlecombe, James		I322230203088  b. 10 Feb 1799 Eling, Hampshire, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
35
Biddlecombe, James		I322230212648  b. Abt 1827 Hampshire, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
36
Biddlecome, James		I322232597202  b. Abt 1811 Hampshire, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
37
Biddlecome, James (Hatch)		I322230630606  b. 28 Jan 1798 Eling, Hampshire, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
38
Biddllecomb, James		P4  b. 1630 Ringwood, Hampshire, England  Biddlecombe One Name Study | William Biddlecomb of Highwood based on this Will
39
Bignell, James		I322333765705  b. Abt 1779 Mitcheldean, Hampshire, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
40
Bignell, James		I12453626624  b. Jul 1874 Old Alresford, Hampshire, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
41
Bignell, James		I322187131968  b. Sep 1874 Alresford, Hampshire, United Kingdom  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
42
Bishop, James Wintleburyth		I1798601309  b. 1848 Southampton, Hampshire, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
43
Blount of the Astley Blounts, James		I322324137635  b. Abt 1591 Astley, Worcestershire, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
44
Boon, James		I1844787937  b. 25 Nov 1839 Wayford, Somerset, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
45
Boon, James		I2042522717  b. 1865 Marlborough Sounds, Marlborough, New Zealand  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
46
Bowditch, James		I322254054410    Hurst Improbable Family Tree
47
Bowditch, James Oliver Richard		I322256616137  b. 14 May 1806 Beaminster, Dorset, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
48
Bowles, James		I1945839148  b. Abt 1828 Dinton, Wiltshire, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
49
Bowles, James		I1945839191  b. Abt 1852 Dinton, Wiltshire, England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
50
Bowring, James		I13035841861  b. 20 Feb 1770 Lillington, Dorset, , England  Hurst Improbable Family Tree

1 2 3 4 5 ... 10» Next»


DNA

DNA testing adds a whole different aspect to Genealogy

You can find relatives you did not know you had, open new branches to your tree, and create validations of people between the match and myself.

Whilst the improbable tree has lots of information yet to be validated, the tree I have created just for DNA matches and the links of ancestors between us, only has spouses that are not in some way validated.

I have started with DNA matches in Ancestry, but will eventually include MyHeritage and GEDmatch matches as well.

A lot to do.

More ...

More background about trees, people, and places

Family Trees can be just a list of people and how they are interrelated.

However they can contain so much more. Records, so many records.

Part of the process of assessment of a record for me, is about location. This takes me into social economic history. In the 19th century, where a lot of our records come from, life was considerably different form today. The very rich could move about the country, and indeed they would with a degree of ease that we have today, albeit on a different timescale. I recently found people on my tree that migrated to North America, and subsequently part of the family moved on to Australia, and set up home there. Shipping passenger records indicate that people from that family frequently visited their relatives both in North America and Britain, before returning to their home in Australia. That was not the lot of the masses though.

More ...

Search

Go back to the rest of my site

Done with looking around this segment, and the database. Perhaps you want to;-

 

 

Go back to Genealogy Home

Go back to Main Website Home