Search Results: Family History of Ivan Hurst

Matches 1 to 14 of 14 for Last Name equals CHIPMAN

#	Last Name, Given Name(s)	Person ID	Born/Christened	Location	Tree \| Branch
1	Chipman	I320166559441	b. 19 Sep 1650	Malden, Middlesex County, Massachusetts, USA	Hurst Improbable Family Tree
2	Chipman, Bethia	I320166559451	b. 1 Jul 1666	Barnstable, Massachusetts	Hurst Improbable Family Tree
3	Chipman, Desire	I320166556841	b. 26 Feb 1673	Barnstable, Barnstable County, Massachusetts, USA	Hurst Improbable Family Tree
4	Chipman, Elizabeth	I320166556846	b. 24 Jan 1648	Plymouth, Plymouth, Massachusetts, United States	Hurst Improbable Family Tree
5	Chipman, Hannah	I320166559445	b. 14 Jan 1658	Barnstable, Barnstable, Colony of Massachusetts, British Colonial Americ	Hurst Improbable Family Tree
6	Chipman, Hannah	I320166704378	b. May 1680		Hurst Improbable Family Tree
7	Chipman, Hope	I320166556842	b. 31 Aug 1652	Barnstable, Barnstable, Massachusetts, United States	Hurst Improbable Family Tree
8	Chipman, John	I320166556840	b. 03 Jun 1621	Bryans Piddle, Near Dorchester, Dorsetshire, England	Hurst Improbable Family Tree
9	Chipman, John	I320166559442	b. 2 Mar 1657	Barnstable County, Massachusetts Bay Colony, British America	Hurst Improbable Family Tree
10	Chipman, John	I320166559439	b. 3 Mar 1670	Barnstable, Massachusetts	Hurst Improbable Family Tree
11	Chipman, Lydia	I320166556843	b. 25 Dec 1654	Plymouth, Barnstable, Massachusetts, USA	Hurst Improbable Family Tree
12	Chipman, Mercy	I320166559454	b. 6 Feb 1668	Barnstable, Massachusetts	Hurst Improbable Family Tree
13	Chipman, Ruth	I320166559450	b. 31 Dec 1663	Barnstable, Barnstable County, Massachusetts, USA	Hurst Improbable Family Tree
14	Chipman, Samuel	I320166556845	b. 15 Apr 1661	Barnstable, Massachusetts	Hurst Improbable Family Tree

DNA testing adds a whole different aspect to Genealogy

You can find relatives you did not know you had, open new branches to your tree, and create validations of people between the match and myself.

Whilst the improbable tree has lots of information yet to be validated, the tree I have created just for DNA matches and the links of ancestors between us, only has spouses that are not in some way validated.

I have started with DNA matches in Ancestry, but will eventually include MyHeritage and GEDmatch matches as well.

A lot to do.

Family Trees can be just a list of people and how they are interrelated.

However they can contain so much more. Records, so many records.

Part of the process of assessment of a record for me, is about location. This takes me into social economic history. In the 19th century, where a lot of our records come from, life was considerably different form today. The very rich could move about the country, and indeed they would with a degree of ease that we have today, albeit on a different timescale. I recently found people on my tree that migrated to North America, and subsequently part of the family moved on to Australia, and set up home there. Shipping passenger records indicate that people from that family frequently visited their relatives both in North America and Britain, before returning to their home in Australia. That was not the lot of the masses though.