My exploration of Genealogy

Home Search Login  
Print Bookmark

Sarah (Dickinson)[1]

Female Abt 1660 - 1744  (85 years)


Personal Information    |    Sources    |    All

  • Name Sarah (Dickinson) 
    Birth Abt 1660  South Kingston, Washington, Rhode Island, United States Find all individuals with events at this location 
    Gender Female 
    Death Aft. 1744  South Kingston, Washington, Rhode Island, United States Find all individuals with events at this location 
    Person ID I322325048412  Hurst Improbable Family Tree
    Last Modified 11 Feb 2022 

    Family Charles Dickinson,   b. 20 Apr 1658, Warwick, Kent, Rhode Island, United States Find all individuals with events at this locationd. 14 Sep 1740, Narragansett, Washington, Rhode Island, United States Find all individuals with events at this location (Age 82 years) 
    Family ID F2687  Group Sheet  |  Family Chart
    Last Modified 11 Feb 2022 

  • Sources 
    1. [S-2080810673] Ancestry, (Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com. Original data: Family Tree files submitted by Ancestry members.), Ancestry Family Tree.


DNA

DNA testing adds a whole different aspect to Genealogy

You can find relatives you did not know you had, open new branches to your tree, and create validations of people between the match and myself.

Whilst the improbable tree has lots of information yet to be validated, the tree I have created just for DNA matches and the links of ancestors between us, only has spouses that are not in some way validated.

I have started with DNA matches in Ancestry, but will eventually include MyHeritage and GEDmatch matches as well.

A lot to do.

More ...

More background about trees, people, and places

Family Trees can be just a list of people and how they are interrelated.

However they can contain so much more. Records, so many records.

Part of the process of assessment of a record for me, is about location. This takes me into social economic history. In the 19th century, where a lot of our records come from, life was considerably different form today. The very rich could move about the country, and indeed they would with a degree of ease that we have today, albeit on a different timescale. I recently found people on my tree that migrated to North America, and subsequently part of the family moved on to Australia, and set up home there. Shipping passenger records indicate that people from that family frequently visited their relatives both in North America and Britain, before returning to their home in Australia. That was not the lot of the masses though.

More ...

Search

Go back to the rest of my site

Done with looking around this segment, and the database. Perhaps you want to;-

 

 

Go back to Genealogy Home

Go back to Main Website Home