Mathilde of Condé-sur-Noireau.: Family History of Ivan Hurst

Generation: 1

1.

Mathilde of Condé-sur-Noireau.

Family/Spouse: William (Princeps) de Bellême - House of Bellême, Seigneur of Bellême. William (son of Yves d'Alençon de Bellême - House of Bellême and Godeheut) was born in Abt. 960; died in 1028. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Children:

2. Benoit de Bellême - House of Bellême, a monk at Fleury Abbey
3. Ives de Bellême - House of Bellême, Seigneur de Bellême and Bishop of Sées
4. Robert de Bellême - House of Bellême, Seigneur de Bellême
5. Warin de Bellême - House of Bellême died in 1026.
6. Fulk de Bellême - House of Bellême died in Bef. 1028.
7. William I Talvas (the shield) House of Bellême, Seigneur of Alençon was born in Abt. 955; died in Abt. 1060.

Generation: 2

2. Benoit de Bellême - House of Bellême, a monk at Fleury Abbey (1.Mathilde¹)
3. Ives de Bellême - House of Bellême, Seigneur de Bellême and Bishop of Sées (1.Mathilde¹)
4. Robert de Bellême - House of Bellême, Seigneur de Bellême (1.Mathilde¹)
5. Warin de Bellême - House of Bellême (1.Mathilde¹) died in 1026.
6. Fulk de Bellême - House of Bellême (1.Mathilde¹) died in Bef. 1028.

7.

William I Talvas (the shield) House of Bellême, Seigneur of Alençon

(1.Mathilde¹) was born in Abt. 955; died in Abt. 1060.

Family/Spouse: de Beaumont. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Children:

8. Oliver de Bellême, House of Bellême

Family/Spouse: Hildeburg. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Children:

9. Arnulf de Bellême, House of Bellême
10. Mabel de Bellême, House of Bellême was born in 1030; died in 1079.

Generation: 3

8. Oliver de Bellême, House of Bellême (7.William², 1.Mathilde¹)
9. Arnulf de Bellême, House of Bellême (7.William², 1.Mathilde¹)

10.

Mabel de Bellême, House of Bellême

(7.William², 1.Mathilde¹) was born in 1030; died in 1079.

Family/Spouse: receiving the Rape of Arundel at the end of 1067 (or in early 1068). William gave Earl Roger nearly all of what is now the county of West Sussex, which at the time of the Domesday Survey was the Rape of Arundel. Roger the Great de Montgomery, First Earl of Shrewsbury, and Earl of Arundel. Roger (son of Roger de Montgomery, Seigneur of Montgomery) was born in Bef. 1046; died in 1094. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Children:

11. Robert of Bellême, seigneur de Bellême (or Belèsme), seigneur de Montgomery, viscount of the Hiémois, 3rd Earl of Shrewsbury and Count of Ponthieu was born in Abt. 1056; died in Aft. 1130.

Generation: 4

11.

Robert of Bellême, seigneur de Bellême (or Belèsme), seigneur de Montgomery, viscount of the Hiémois, 3rd Earl of Shrewsbury and Count of Ponthieu

(10.Mabel³, 7.William², 1.Mathilde¹) was born in Abt. 1056; died in Aft. 1130.

Family/Spouse: Unknown. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Children:

12. William III of Ponthieu, Seigneur de Montgomery in Normandy and Count of Ponthieu was born in 1093; died in 1172.

Generation: 5

12.

William III of Ponthieu, Seigneur de Montgomery in Normandy and Count of Ponthieu

(11.Robert⁴, 10.Mabel³, 7.William², 1.Mathilde¹) was born in 1093; died in 1172.

Family/Spouse: Unknown. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Children:

13. Ela

Generation: 6

13. Ela (12.William⁵, 11.Robert⁴, 10.Mabel³, 7.William², 1.Mathilde¹)
Family/Spouse: Walter of Salisbury. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

DNA testing adds a whole different aspect to Genealogy

You can find relatives you did not know you had, open new branches to your tree, and create validations of people between the match and myself.

Whilst the improbable tree has lots of information yet to be validated, the tree I have created just for DNA matches and the links of ancestors between us, only has spouses that are not in some way validated.

I have started with DNA matches in Ancestry, but will eventually include MyHeritage and GEDmatch matches as well.

A lot to do.

Family Trees can be just a list of people and how they are interrelated.

However they can contain so much more. Records, so many records.

Part of the process of assessment of a record for me, is about location. This takes me into social economic history. In the 19th century, where a lot of our records come from, life was considerably different form today. The very rich could move about the country, and indeed they would with a degree of ease that we have today, albeit on a different timescale. I recently found people on my tree that migrated to North America, and subsequently part of the family moved on to Australia, and set up home there. Shipping passenger records indicate that people from that family frequently visited their relatives both in North America and Britain, before returning to their home in Australia. That was not the lot of the masses though.