My exploration of Genealogy

Home Search Login
Print Bookmark

de Green

Male

Generations:      Standard    |    Compact    |    Vertical    |    Text    |    Register    |    Tables

More detail
Generation: 1

  1. 1.  de Green

    Family/Spouse: Phillipa de Ferrers. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

    Children:
    1. 2. Thomas de Green  Descendancy chart to this point was born in 1430; died in 1508.


Generation: 2

  1. 2.  Thomas de Green Descendancy chart to this point (1.1) was born in 1430; died in 1508.

    Family/Spouse: Unknown. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

    Children:
    1. 3. John de Green  Descendancy chart to this point was born in 1448; died in 1520.


Generation: 3

  1. 3.  John de Green Descendancy chart to this point (2.Thomas2, 1.1) was born in 1448; died in 1520.

    Family/Spouse: Unknown. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

    Children:
    1. 4. Robert de Green  Descendancy chart to this point was born in 1490; died in 1543.


Generation: 4

  1. 4.  Robert de Green Descendancy chart to this point (3.John3, 2.Thomas2, 1.1) was born in 1490; died in 1543.

    Family/Spouse: Unknown. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

    Children:
    1. 5. Unknown Green  Descendancy chart to this point was born in Abt. 1520; died in Aft. 1560.


Generation: 5

  1. 5.  Unknown Green Descendancy chart to this point (4.Robert4, 3.John3, 2.Thomas2, 1.1) was born in Abt. 1520; died in Aft. 1560.

    Family/Spouse: Unknown. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

    Children:
    1. 6. Richard Green  Descendancy chart to this point was born in 1560; died in 1617.


Generation: 6

  1. 6.  Richard Green Descendancy chart to this point (5.Unknown5, 4.Robert4, 3.John3, 2.Thomas2, 1.1) was born in 1560; died in 1617.

    Family/Spouse: Unknown. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

    Children:
    1. 7. John Green  Descendancy chart to this point was born in 1597; died in 1659.


Generation: 7

  1. 7.  John Green Descendancy chart to this point (6.Richard6, 5.Unknown5, 4.Robert4, 3.John3, 2.Thomas2, 1.1) was born in 1597; died in 1659.

    Family/Spouse: Unknown. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

    Children:
    1. 8. John Green  Descendancy chart to this point was born in 1620; died in 1708.


Generation: 8

  1. 8.  John Green Descendancy chart to this point (7.John7, 6.Richard6, 5.Unknown5, 4.Robert4, 3.John3, 2.Thomas2, 1.1) was born in 1620; died in 1708.

    Family/Spouse: Unknown. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

    Children:
    1. 9. Phillipa Phylis Green  Descendancy chart to this point was born on 7 Oct 1658 in Warwick, Kent, Rhode Island, United States; died on 3 Mar 1690 in Warwick, Kent, Rhode Island, United States, .


Generation: 9

  1. 9.  Phillipa Phylis Green Descendancy chart to this point (8.John8, 7.John7, 6.Richard6, 5.Unknown5, 4.Robert4, 3.John3, 2.Thomas2, 1.1) was born on 7 Oct 1658 in Warwick, Kent, Rhode Island, United States; died on 3 Mar 1690 in Warwick, Kent, Rhode Island, United States, .

    Family/Spouse: Charles Dickinson. Charles was born on 20 Apr 1658 in Warwick, Kent, Rhode Island, United States; died on 14 Sep 1740 in Narragansett, Washington, Rhode Island, United States. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]



DNA

DNA testing adds a whole different aspect to Genealogy

You can find relatives you did not know you had, open new branches to your tree, and create validations of people between the match and myself.

Whilst the improbable tree has lots of information yet to be validated, the tree I have created just for DNA matches and the links of ancestors between us, only has spouses that are not in some way validated.

I have started with DNA matches in Ancestry, but will eventually include MyHeritage and GEDmatch matches as well.

A lot to do.

More ...

More background about trees, people, and places

Family Trees can be just a list of people and how they are interrelated.

However they can contain so much more. Records, so many records.

Part of the process of assessment of a record for me, is about location. This takes me into social economic history. In the 19th century, where a lot of our records come from, life was considerably different form today. The very rich could move about the country, and indeed they would with a degree of ease that we have today, albeit on a different timescale. I recently found people on my tree that migrated to North America, and subsequently part of the family moved on to Australia, and set up home there. Shipping passenger records indicate that people from that family frequently visited their relatives both in North America and Britain, before returning to their home in Australia. That was not the lot of the masses though.

More ...

Search

Go back to the rest of my site

Done with looking around this segment, and the database. Perhaps you want to;-

 

 

Go back to Genealogy Home

Go back to Main Website Home