My exploration of Genealogy

Home Search Login  
Print Bookmark

Buckinghamshire, England



 


Tree: One Place Study of Sopley

County/Shire : Latitude: 51.833333, Longitude: -0.833333

Tree: Hurst One Name Study

County/Shire : Latitude: 51.833333, Longitude: -0.833333


Birth

Matches 1 to 18 of 18

   Last Name, Given Name(s)    Birth    Person ID   Tree 
1 Dancer, James  Abt 1835Buckinghamshire, England I12030951812 Hurst Improbable Family Tree 
2 Dancer, Kitty  Abt 1830Buckinghamshire, England I12030932722 Hurst Improbable Family Tree 
3 Dancer, Sarah  Abt 1828Buckinghamshire, England I12030922379 Hurst Improbable Family Tree 
4 Danser, Henry  1530Buckinghamshire, England I12009461279 Hurst Improbable Family Tree 
5 Danser (Dancer), John  1550Buckinghamshire, England I12009457397 Hurst Improbable Family Tree 
6 Hurst, Isaac  Abt 1821Buckinghamshire, England I322188233576 Hurst Improbable Family Tree 
7 Hurst, Isaac  1821Buckinghamshire, England I269 Hurst One Name Study 
8 Hurst, Mary  Abt. 1821Buckinghamshire, England I322188233840 Hurst Improbable Family Tree 
9 Hurst, Mary  1821Buckinghamshire, England I270 Hurst One Name Study 
10 Hurst, Mary  1829Buckinghamshire, England I271 Hurst One Name Study 
11 Hurst, Rebeca  1837Buckinghamshire, England I267 Hurst One Name Study 
12 Hurst, Rebeca  Nov 1837Buckinghamshire, England I322188259667 Hurst Improbable Family Tree 
13 Jarvis, Francis  Abt 1826Buckinghamshire, England I1899099042 Hurst Improbable Family Tree 
14 Jarvis, Henry  Abt 1828Buckinghamshire, England I1899174273 Hurst Improbable Family Tree 
15 Mansell, Elisabeth  1818Buckinghamshire, England I266 Hurst One Name Study 
16 Matthews, Thomas  Abt 1844Buckinghamshire, England I322259626253 Hurst Improbable Family Tree 
17 Weedon, James  7 Jul 1793Buckinghamshire, England I12007945146 Hurst Improbable Family Tree 
18 Weedon, Mary  10 Dec 1784Buckinghamshire, England I12007945128 Hurst Improbable Family Tree 

Death

Matches 1 to 5 of 5

   Last Name, Given Name(s)    Death    Person ID   Tree 
1 Danser, Henry  1599Buckinghamshire, England I12009461279 Hurst Improbable Family Tree 
2 Danser (Dancer), John  Buckinghamshire, England I12009457397 Hurst Improbable Family Tree 
3 Hurst, Frances  1589Buckinghamshire, England I322189685916 Hurst Improbable Family Tree 
4 Marcham, Anne  26 May 1851Buckinghamshire, England I322187008994 Hurst Improbable Family Tree 
5 Weedon, John  1879Buckinghamshire, England I12007945158 Hurst Improbable Family Tree 

Executor

Matches 1 to 1 of 1

   Last Name, Given Name(s)    Executor    Person ID   Tree 
1 HURST, Thomas Davey  17 Aug 1858Buckinghamshire, England I322188697702 Hurst Improbable Family Tree 

Residence

Matches 1 to 1 of 1

   Last Name, Given Name(s)    Residence    Person ID   Tree 
1 Wyatt, Joseph  1836Buckinghamshire, England I1798601326 Hurst Improbable Family Tree 

Marriage

Matches 1 to 3 of 3

   Family    Marriage    Family ID   Tree 
1 Hurst / Quinney  Abt. 1660Buckinghamshire, England F2550 Hurst Improbable Family Tree 
2 Weedon / Boddington  31 Dec 1781Buckinghamshire, England F3884 Hurst Improbable Family Tree 
3 Weedon / Harris  20 Feb 1780Buckinghamshire, England F1297 Hurst Improbable Family Tree 

DNA

DNA testing adds a whole different aspect to Genealogy

You can find relatives you did not know you had, open new branches to your tree, and create validations of people between the match and myself.

Whilst the improbable tree has lots of information yet to be validated, the tree I have created just for DNA matches and the links of ancestors between us, only has spouses that are not in some way validated.

I have started with DNA matches in Ancestry, but will eventually include MyHeritage and GEDmatch matches as well.

A lot to do.

More ...

More background about trees, people, and places

Family Trees can be just a list of people and how they are interrelated.

However they can contain so much more. Records, so many records.

Part of the process of assessment of a record for me, is about location. This takes me into social economic history. In the 19th century, where a lot of our records come from, life was considerably different form today. The very rich could move about the country, and indeed they would with a degree of ease that we have today, albeit on a different timescale. I recently found people on my tree that migrated to North America, and subsequently part of the family moved on to Australia, and set up home there. Shipping passenger records indicate that people from that family frequently visited their relatives both in North America and Britain, before returning to their home in Australia. That was not the lot of the masses though.

More ...

Search

Go back to the rest of my site

Done with looking around this segment, and the database. Perhaps you want to;-

 

 

Go back to Genealogy Home

Go back to Main Website Home