Descendancy for Mary Bricknell: Family History of Ivan Hurst

Mary Bricknell

1781 - 1845 (64 years)

( = Descendancy chart to this point, = Expand, = Collapse)

1 Mary Bricknell ^[1] b. About 1781 d. 1q 1845
- William Fenwick b. About 1781 d. 2q 1844
  - 2 William John Fenwick ^[1.1] b. About 1812 d. Jul 1879
    - Elizabeth Westlake b. About 1815 d. Jan 1883
      - 3 John Westlake Fenwick ^[1.1.1] b. About 1835 d. 3q 1868
        
        Sarah Jane Elston b. About 1836
        
        4 Albert Edward W Fenwick ^[1.1.1.1] b. 3q 1866 d. 1q 1949
        
        4 John Westlake Fenwick ^[1.1.1.2] b. Q3 1868 d. 27 Jan 1929 [ =>]
      - 3 William Fenwick ^[1.1.2] b. About 1836
      - 3 Edward Westlake Fenwick ^[1.1.3] b. 4q 1839 d. 4q 1860
      - 3 Albert James Fenwick ^[1.1.4] b. About 1842 d. Jul 1879
      - 3 George Westlake Fenwick ^[1.1.5] b. About 1845 d. 22 November 1884
      - 3 Elizabeth Westlake Fenwick ^[1.1.6] b. 1q 1849 d. 2q 1872
  - 2 Caroline Fenwick ^[1.2] b. Abt 1815
  - 2 Edwin Fenwick ^[1.3] b. Abt 1815 d. Abt 1895
  - 2 Frederick Fenwick ^[1.4] b. Abt 1824
  - 2 Matilda Emily Fenwick ^[1.5] b. Abt 1828 d. Abt 1863
  - 2 James Fenwick ^[1.6] b. Abt 1831

DNA testing adds a whole different aspect to Genealogy

You can find relatives you did not know you had, open new branches to your tree, and create validations of people between the match and myself.

Whilst the improbable tree has lots of information yet to be validated, the tree I have created just for DNA matches and the links of ancestors between us, only has spouses that are not in some way validated.

I have started with DNA matches in Ancestry, but will eventually include MyHeritage and GEDmatch matches as well.

A lot to do.

More ...

Family Trees can be just a list of people and how they are interrelated.

However they can contain so much more. Records, so many records.

Part of the process of assessment of a record for me, is about location. This takes me into social economic history. In the 19th century, where a lot of our records come from, life was considerably different form today. The very rich could move about the country, and indeed they would with a degree of ease that we have today, albeit on a different timescale. I recently found people on my tree that migrated to North America, and subsequently part of the family moved on to Australia, and set up home there. Shipping passenger records indicate that people from that family frequently visited their relatives both in North America and Britain, before returning to their home in Australia. That was not the lot of the masses though.

More ...

My exploration of Genealogy

Mary Bricknell

DNA

More background about trees, people, and places

Search

Go back to the rest of my site