My exploration of Genealogy

Home Search Login  
Print Bookmark

Harriett Natt

Female 1846 - 1879  (33 years)


Generations:      Standard    |    Vertical    |    Compact    |    Box    |    Text    |    Ahnentafel    |    Fan Chart    |    Media

More detail
Generation: 1

  1. 1.  Harriett Natt was born on 2 May 1846 in Highham, Kent, England (daughter of Frederick Natt and Ruth Brooker); died on 29 Jun 1879 in Wauraltee, South Australia, Australia.

Generation: 2

  1. 2.  Frederick Natt was born in 1804 in Cobham, Kent, England (son of Joseph NATT and Hannah WELLS); died on 14 Oct 1884 in Bugle Ranges, South Australia, Australia; was buried after 14 Oct 1884 in Wistow, South Australia, Australia.

    Frederick married Ruth Brooker on 21 Feb 1828 in Higham (Near Rochester), Kent, England. Ruth was born on 22 May 1808 in Higham, Kent, England; died on 12 Oct 1895 in Bugle Range, South Australia, Australia. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]


  2. 3.  Ruth Brooker was born on 22 May 1808 in Higham, Kent, England; died on 12 Oct 1895 in Bugle Range, South Australia, Australia.
    Children:
    1. William Natt was born on 3 Mar 1829 in Highham, Kent, England; died on 8 Nov 1903 in Avenue Range, South Australia, Australia.
    2. Frederick Natt was born in 1831 in Highham, Kent, England; died on 28 Jan 1897 in Langhorne Creek, South Australia, Australia.
    3. Joseph Natt was born on 30 Sep 1832 in Kent, England; died in 1919 in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
    4. Charles Natt was born on 25 May 1834 in Highham, Kent, England; died on 12 May 1911 in Stansbury, South Australia, Australia.
    5. Rosina Natt was born on 5 Apr 1836 in Kent, England; died on 8 Jan 1909 in Blakiston, South Australia, Australia.
    6. James Natt was born on 2 Jan 1838 in Kent, England.
    7. Ruth Youens Natt was born on 30 Nov 1839 in Highham, Kent, England; died on 24 Jul 1925 in Gawler, South Australia, Australia.
    8. Thomas Youens Natt was born in 1841 in Kent, England; died in Dec 1842 in Kent, England.
    9. Sophia Youens Natt was born on 7 Jan 1843 in Kent, England; died on 6 Dec 1931 in Wistow, South Australia, Australia.
    10. Thomas Youens Natt was born on 14 Oct 1844 in Kent, England; died on 17 Sep 1904 in Wistow, South Australia, Australia.
    11. 1. Harriett Natt was born on 2 May 1846 in Highham, Kent, England; died on 29 Jun 1879 in Wauraltee, South Australia, Australia.
    12. Albert Natt was born on 22 Mar 1848 in Highham, Kent, England; died in Dec 1848 in Gravesend, Kent, England.
    13. Emma Natt was born in 1851 in South Australia, Australia; died in Jul 1920 in Moonta, South Australia, Australia.


Generation: 3

  1. 4.  Joseph NATT was born in Nov 1777 in Luddesdown, Kent, England (son of William Natt and Sarah GAMBRELL); died on 11 Jan 1816 in Shorne, Kent, England.

    Joseph married Hannah WELLSChatham, Kent, England. Hannah was born in Mar 1778 in Cobham, Kent, England; died in 1832 in Shorne, Kent, England. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]


  2. 5.  Hannah WELLS was born in Mar 1778 in Cobham, Kent, England; died in 1832 in Shorne, Kent, England.
    Children:
    1. Eleanor NATT was born in 1799; died in 1799 in Cobham, Kent, England.
    2. Jane NATT was born in 1800 in Cobham, Kent, England; died in 1855 in Shorne, Kent, England.
    3. 2. Frederick Natt was born in 1804 in Cobham, Kent, England; died on 14 Oct 1884 in Bugle Ranges, South Australia, Australia; was buried after 14 Oct 1884 in Wistow, South Australia, Australia.
    4. William Natt was born about 1808 in Cobham, Kent, England; died in 1877 in Frindsbury, Kent, England.
    5. George Natt was born in 1811 in Shorne, Kent, England; died in Apr 1866 in Kent, England.
    6. Anne Natt was born in 1814; died in 1815 in Shorne, Kent, England.
    7. Sarah NATT was born in 1816 in Shorne, Kent, England; died in 1816 in Shorne, Kent, England.


Generation: 4

  1. 8.  William Natt was born on 23 Feb 1745 in Cobham, Kent, England (son of George NATT and Mary Hony); died in 1807 in Cobham, Kent, England.

    William married Sarah GAMBRELL on 04 Jul 1768 in Cobham, Kent, England. Sarah was born in 1747 in Cobham, Kent, England; died in 1819 in Brompton, Kent, England. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]


  2. 9.  Sarah GAMBRELL was born in 1747 in Cobham, Kent, England; died in 1819 in Brompton, Kent, England.
    Children:
    1. William NATT was born about 1768 in Cobham, Kent, England; died in 1769 in Cobham, Kent, England.
    2. William NATT was born in Abt. 1770 in Cobham, Kent, England; died on 25 Jul 1839 in Maidstone, Kent, England.
    3. Sarah Natt was born in 1771 in Cobham, Kent, England; died in Oct 1837 in Malling, Kent, England.
    4. Frederick NATT was born about 1776 in Luddesdown, Kent, England.
    5. 4. Joseph NATT was born in Nov 1777 in Luddesdown, Kent, England; died on 11 Jan 1816 in Shorne, Kent, England.
    6. Jane NATT was born in 1780 in Luddesdown, Kent, England; died in 1788 in Cobham, Kent, England.
    7. Lydia NATT was born in 1784; died in 1784 in Cobham, Kent, England.
    8. George Natt was born on 6 Mar 1785 in Cobham, Kent, England; died on 15 Oct 1850 in Aylesford, Kent, England.


DNA

DNA testing adds a whole different aspect to Genealogy

You can find relatives you did not know you had, open new branches to your tree, and create validations of people between the match and myself.

Whilst the improbable tree has lots of information yet to be validated, the tree I have created just for DNA matches and the links of ancestors between us, only has spouses that are not in some way validated.

I have started with DNA matches in Ancestry, but will eventually include MyHeritage and GEDmatch matches as well.

A lot to do.

More ...

More background about trees, people, and places

Family Trees can be just a list of people and how they are interrelated.

However they can contain so much more. Records, so many records.

Part of the process of assessment of a record for me, is about location. This takes me into social economic history. In the 19th century, where a lot of our records come from, life was considerably different form today. The very rich could move about the country, and indeed they would with a degree of ease that we have today, albeit on a different timescale. I recently found people on my tree that migrated to North America, and subsequently part of the family moved on to Australia, and set up home there. Shipping passenger records indicate that people from that family frequently visited their relatives both in North America and Britain, before returning to their home in Australia. That was not the lot of the masses though.

More ...

Search

Go back to the rest of my site

Done with looking around this segment, and the database. Perhaps you want to;-

 

 

Go back to Genealogy Home

Go back to Main Website Home