Descendancy for William Young: Family History of Ivan Hurst

William Young

1847 - 1928 (81 years)

( = Descendancy chart to this point, = Expand, = Collapse)

1 William Young ^[1] b. Abt. Jan 1847 d. Abt. Oct 1928
- Emily Kitcher b. 1839 d. Mar 1924
  - 2 Florence Emily Young ^[1.1] b. 1868
  - 2 Mary E Young ^[1.2] b. 1870 d. Bef. 1881
  - 2 Kate Maria Young ^[1.3] b. 28 Sep 1872 d. Dec 1964
    - Thomas Bonner b. 20 Oct 1850 d. 1 Feb 1923
      - 3 Frederick Thomas Bonner, aka Tom ^[1.3.1] b. 20 May 1904 d. Mar 2001
      - 3 Maurice James Bonner, aka Sam ^[1.3.2] b. 22 Nov 1905 d. Oct 1997
      - 3 Infant girl Bonner ^[1.3.3] b. 08 Mar 1907 d. Mar 1907
      - 3 Annie Maria Bonner ^[1.3.4] b. 8 Mar 1907 d. 15 Jun 1975
        
        + Oscar Morris Jays b. 10 Dec 1911 d. Abt. Jun 1944
        
        + Harold Rossiter b. 17 Sep 1896 d. Jun 1970
        
        + Charlie Hooker b. Abt. Jul 1877
        
        4 Florence E Bonner ^[1.3.4.1] [ =>]
      - 3 Emily Harriet Elizabeth Bonner ^[1.3.5] b. 13 Oct 1909 d. 22 Dec 1971
  - 2 Joseph William Young ^[1.4] b. 31 Jan 1873 d. 25 Aug 1943
  - 2 Frederick James Young ^[1.5] b. 28 Dec 1876 d. Sep 1961

DNA testing adds a whole different aspect to Genealogy

You can find relatives you did not know you had, open new branches to your tree, and create validations of people between the match and myself.

Whilst the improbable tree has lots of information yet to be validated, the tree I have created just for DNA matches and the links of ancestors between us, only has spouses that are not in some way validated.

I have started with DNA matches in Ancestry, but will eventually include MyHeritage and GEDmatch matches as well.

A lot to do.

More ...

Family Trees can be just a list of people and how they are interrelated.

However they can contain so much more. Records, so many records.

Part of the process of assessment of a record for me, is about location. This takes me into social economic history. In the 19th century, where a lot of our records come from, life was considerably different form today. The very rich could move about the country, and indeed they would with a degree of ease that we have today, albeit on a different timescale. I recently found people on my tree that migrated to North America, and subsequently part of the family moved on to Australia, and set up home there. Shipping passenger records indicate that people from that family frequently visited their relatives both in North America and Britain, before returning to their home in Australia. That was not the lot of the masses though.

More ...

My exploration of Genealogy

William Young

DNA

More background about trees, people, and places

Search

Go back to the rest of my site