Descendancy for Elizabeth Stanley: Family History of Ivan Hurst

Elizabeth Stanley

Abt 1834 -

( = Descendancy chart to this point, = Expand, = Collapse)

1 Elizabeth Stanley ^[1] b. Abt 1834
- Thomas Stanley b. Abt 1828
  - 2 Unknown Stanley ^[1.1]
    - - 3 William Thomas Stanley ^[1.1.1] b. Jul 1881
        
        Bertha Weyman b. Abt 1886
        
        4 William Charles H Stanley ^[1.1.1.1] b. 07 January 1912 d. March 1980
        
        + Millicent Martha Hurst b. 21 May 1915 d. October 1997
  - 2 George Stanley ^[1.2] b. Abt 1855
  - 2 Thomas Stanley ^[1.3] b. Abt 1857
  - 2 William Stanley ^[1.4] b. Abt 1859
    - Fanny Prouten b. Abt 1862 d. 1951
      - 3 William C Stanley ^[1.4.1] b. Abt 1890
      - 3 Marion Fanny Stanley ^[1.4.2] b. 21 Mar 1892 d. 26 Jun 1979
        
        + Albert George Kew b. 17 Jan 1879 d. 17 Apr 1947
      - 3 Frederick T Stanley ^[1.4.3] b. Abt 1895
      - 3 Victor P Stanley ^[1.4.4] b. Abt 1898
  - 2 Elizabeth Stanley ^[1.5] b. Abt 1861
  - 2 Mary Stanley ^[1.6] b. Abt 1864
    - John Gregory b. 1867
      - 3 Edwin John Gregory ^[1.6.1] b. 29 December 1886 d. 1965
  - 2 John Stanley ^[1.7] b. Abt 1866

DNA testing adds a whole different aspect to Genealogy

You can find relatives you did not know you had, open new branches to your tree, and create validations of people between the match and myself.

Whilst the improbable tree has lots of information yet to be validated, the tree I have created just for DNA matches and the links of ancestors between us, only has spouses that are not in some way validated.

I have started with DNA matches in Ancestry, but will eventually include MyHeritage and GEDmatch matches as well.

A lot to do.

More ...

Family Trees can be just a list of people and how they are interrelated.

However they can contain so much more. Records, so many records.

Part of the process of assessment of a record for me, is about location. This takes me into social economic history. In the 19th century, where a lot of our records come from, life was considerably different form today. The very rich could move about the country, and indeed they would with a degree of ease that we have today, albeit on a different timescale. I recently found people on my tree that migrated to North America, and subsequently part of the family moved on to Australia, and set up home there. Shipping passenger records indicate that people from that family frequently visited their relatives both in North America and Britain, before returning to their home in Australia. That was not the lot of the masses though.

More ...

My exploration of Genealogy

Elizabeth Stanley

DNA

More background about trees, people, and places

Search

Go back to the rest of my site